Security

Security and Justice from a District Perspective: Dang

Rebecca Crozier
Bhasker Kafle
Fri, 01/10/2010
International Alert
16 pages
London, UK
NA

These ‘snapshot’ briefings are part of a longer-term initiative by International Alert to help address the current gaps in knowledge and understanding between those actors at the district level and those in Kathmandu. Each briefing aims to outline current security and justice needs and challenges in a particular district, and advance constructive recommendations for ways in which national and international actors could address these challenges. The briefings are based on research undertaken as part of Alert’s work for the Initiative for Peacebuilding project.

This snapshot focuses on Dang, a district in the western Terai where political party youth wings are increasingly blamed for exacerbating insecurity.

Publication Image

Security and Justice from a District Perspective: Rukum

Ratna Shrestha
Nicola Williams
Fri, 01/10/2010
International Alert
16 pages
London, UK
NA

These ‘snapshot’ briefings are part of a longer-term initiative by International Alert to help address the current gaps in knowledge and understanding between those actors at the district level and those in Kathmandu. Each briefing aims to outline current security and justice needs and challenges in a particular district, and advance constructive recommendations for ways in which national and international actors could address these challenges. The briefings are based on research undertaken as part of Alert’s work for the Initiative for Peacebuilding project.

This snapshot focuses on Rukum, a district in the western hill region at the heart of the Maoist conflict. This briefing examines the security situation in the district four years after the signing of the peace agreement.

Publication Image

Security and Justice from a County Perspective Bong County, Liberia

Richard Reeve
Jackson Speare
Mon, 01/11/2010
International Alert
20 pages
London, UK
NA

This briefing paper focuses on Bong County in central Liberia, one of the areas worst affected by conflict in the Mano River Union. It forms part of International Alert’s work to address the current gaps in knowledge and understanding between local actors in the leeward counties and those in Monrovia. Each briefing in this series aims to outline current security and justice needs and challenges in a particular county and advance constructive recommendations for ways in which national and international actors could address these challenges. It is based on research undertaken as part of Alert’s work for the Security Cluster of the Initiative for Peacebuilding project.

Publication Image

Security and Justice from a County Perspective Grand Gedeh County, Liberia

Richard Reeve
Jackson Speare
Mon, 01/11/2010
International Alert
18 pages
London, UK
NA

This briefing paper focuses on Grand Gedeh County in southeast Liberia, one of the areas worst affected by conflict in the Mano River Union. It forms part of International Alert’s work to address the current gaps in knowledge and understanding between local actors in the leeward counties and those in Monrovia. Each briefing in this series aims to outline current security and justice needs and challenges in a particular county and advance constructive recommendations for ways in which national and international actors could address these challenges. It is based on research undertaken as part of Alert’s work for the Security Cluster of the Initiative for Peacebuilding project.

Publication Image

Security and Justice from a County Perspective: Lofa County, Liberia

Richard Reeve
Jackson Speare
Mon, 01/11/2010
International Alert
20 pages
London, UK
NA

This briefing paper focuses on Lofa County in northern Liberia, one of the areas worst affected by conflict in the Mano River Union. It forms part of International Alert’s work to address the current gaps in knowledge and understanding between local actors in the leeward counties and those in Monrovia. Each briefing in this series aims to outline current security and justice needs and challenges in a particular county and advance constructive recommendations for ways in which national and international actors could address these challenges. It is based on research undertaken as part of Alert’s work for the Security Cluster of the Initiative for Peacebuilding project.

Publication Image

Participation and Obstruction: Justice and Security Sector Refom in Nepal

Country Case Study: Nepal
Rebecca Crozier
Zuleika Candan
Mon, 01/11/2010
International Alert
28 pages
London, UK
NA

This briefing paper aims to outline priorities for international community support for the effective and accountable provision of security and justice in Nepal. It aims to highlight the need for utilising a participatory approaches in the promotion of people-centred reform of the security and justice system. There is growing political will to address these issues on a national and international level, yet the international community could improve its response with improved coordination and increasing the capacity of local actors to participate in any future justice and security sector reform process.

Publication Image

Implementing Resolution 1325 in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone

Charting a Way Forward
Steven Schoofs
Chitra Nagarajan
Lulsegged Abebe
Wed, 01/09/2010
International Alert
12 pages
London, UK
978-906677-70-1

International Alert has worked in West Africa for many years, and has a long association with Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone, the original member countries of the Mano River Union (MRU)1. Since 2007 much of its focus in the region has been on gender issues in peacebuilding. International Alert’s work uses UN Security Council Resolution 1325 on women, peace and security as a way of addressing women’s priorities in peacebuilding.

This briefing note seeks to contribute to the knowledge on Resolution 1325, building on International Alert’s work in the MRU region during the last few years. The first section briefly discusses the need to adjust the approach to implementing Resolution 1325 in challenging contexts such as post-conflict Sierra Leone and Liberia and conflict-prone Guinea. Based on a brief discussion of salient issues and thematic priorities across the three countries, the subsequent section sketches the contours of a comprehensive agenda for implementing Resolution 1325 in the MRU region. The three components of this agenda are addressing women's security needs, enhancing their political participation, and implementing gender equality legislation and policies. The briefing note ends with the following four broad recommendations to sustain and enhance work on Resolution 1325 in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone:
1. Working (better) with what exists: Engage custodians of the customary justice system.
2. Address sexual and gender-based violence: Mobilise communities through change agents.
3. Economics matters: Address the economic dimension of gender, peace and security.
4. From plans to action: Make smart investments in civil society.

Publication Image

Human Security in the Mano River Union

Empowering Women to Counter Gender-based Violence in Border Communities
Richard Reeve
Sat, 15/05/2010
International Alert
28 pages
London, UK
978-1-906677-84-8

Sexual and gender-based violence in the MRU

Sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) has been one of the major legacies of the 14-year (1989-2003) regional conflict in the Mano River Union (MRU). In response, in 2008 International Alert and its partners designed an initiative targeting war-affected communities in nine border areas of Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone. This Human Security in the MRU project has challenged knowledge, attitudes and practices concerning SGBV in order to reduce perpetration and the stigmatisation of survivors, and provided information, counselling and advocacy in order to guide men and women through prevention and redress actions. This report aims to capture the experiences of the project in the context of work in three interlinked but quite specific country contexts. It looks at the extent of SGBV and domestic violence as experienced in the target communities, details the challenges and best practices of project staff in their attempts to raise awareness and change attitudes and practices, and analyses the particular challenges of providing security and accessing justice (statutory or customary) in the various target communities. It concludes with a series of recommendations for the improved provision of security and justice for women, girls and other vulnerable groups within the MRU.

Publication Image

Security and Justice from a District Perspective: Mahottari, Nepal

Snapshot series 1
International Alert
Sun, 14/11/2010
International Alert
16 pages
London, UK
78-1-906677-83-1

This short briefing is based on focus group discussions and interviews in Mahottari district during May 2010. Interviews and community consultations were held in the district headquarters of Jaleshwor, and in Bardibas and Gauribas Village Development Committees (VDC).

This snapshot briefing paper looks at the situation of security and justice provision in Mahottari district in the central Terai region of Nepal. Mahottari is a border district where the police struggle to control the activities of numerous armed and criminal groups, and levels of gender based violence are extremely high. This briefing assesses security and justice provision against this backdrop and outlines implications for national and international policy-makers.

Publication Image

Security and Justice from a District Perspective: Rasuwa, Nepal

Snapshot series 1
International Alert
Sun, 14/11/2010
International Alert
16 pages
London, UK
978-1-906677-87-9

This snapshot briefing paper looks at the situation of security and justice provision in Rasuwa district in the central region of Nepal. This sparsely populated mountain district is situated due north of Kathmandu and shares a border with China on its northern side. The security situation in Rasuwa district is fair in comparison to many other districts, particularly those in the Terai where the police struggle to control the activities of numerous armed and criminal groups. In contrast to the Terai districts where levels of gender based violence are extremely high, this district populated by 63.75 percent of Tamang ethnicity has different story to tell. This briefing assesses security and justice provision against this backdrop and outlines implications for national and international policy-makers.

Publication Image

Small Arms and Light Weapons (SALW)

Small arms and light weapons (SALW)

Small arms and light weapons - including revolvers, rifles, sub-machine guns and portable anti-tank and anti-aircraft guns - cause insecurity and human suffering in numerous places across the globe and hamper sustainable development. Removing these weapons and addressing the causes of proliferation are a crucial part of promoting peace and creating safer societies.

Community Security

It is accepted that security at the national (or state) level is key in post conflict/settlement contexts. Engagement with state institutions is essential, however this should not be attempted at the exclusion of local and community level security considerations. Security at the local and community level is of equal importance both in and of itself and if programmes for national security are to have any sustainability or traction.
 

With its partners in civil society, governments and international organisations, International Alert played an important role in At the heart of the issue is the rebuilding of relationships and social structures and this has to be a step by step process, starting from the bottom up. Amongst all the complicated policy and programme development the real goal of the initiatives, improving the security situation for the population at large, is often lost.

If individuals and communities don’t see an improvement in their day to day security then they are unlikely to back any national level initiatives. Furthermore without adequate structures and mechanisms in place small scale disputes and conflicts may turn violent and escalate. Amidst the national level programming that takes place there is a need to gain an understanding of the real security challenges and fears faced at the local level and, with the input and participation of those affected, develop programming targeted to address these concerns.

We work to ensure that community needs and concerns are heard at the national level and are taken into account in programme planning and implementation. Furthermore we seek to facilitate understanding of these national processes at the local level so that people have an understanding of the decisions and activities that affect them and do not have unrealistic expectations of what can be achieved.

Contact
Contact Name: 
Richard Reeve

Disarment, Demobilization and Reintegration (DDR)

Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) - A process that contributes to security and stability in a post-conflict recovery context by removing weapons from the hands of combatants, taking the combatants out of military structures and helping them to integrate socially and economically into society by finding civilian livelihoods.

In countries emerging from conflict the presence of a large number of ex-combatants and those associated with fighting forces (such as wives, porters, cooks, sex slaves) poses a great threat to sustainable peace. Many of these people will have known no other way of life than war and violence. Their sense of identity is integrally linked with the armed structures they have been fighting with. Often ex-combatants lack the marketable skills, material assets and social networks required to find alternative livelihoods, and a return to war or a life of criminality and banditry offer the most viable way of life.

In an attempt to mitigate this threat, Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration (DDR) programmes have become an integral component of peace agreements, implemented across the world from Liberia to Kosovo to Afghanistan. Despite their widespread use, their success has been limited. The consequences of inadequate DDR programmes can impact on the success of peace agreements, stability of states and regions, human development and on crime, security and human security in all contexts.

In recent years thinking on DDR has advanced. Where DDR was generally seen as an explicitly military process with a primary focus on short term stability and security, there is now a growing understanding that it is a process that has long term development implications and has to be sustainable. However there remain substantial challenges both at the policy level and in implementation on the ground.

Alert works to:
  • Enhance the design and implementation of DDR programmes at the country level through action orientated research, work with our partners and advocacy activities;
  • Explore how to achieve the end goal of DDR through alternative means including linking certain DDR activities to longer term development activities. This is because the sensitivity of the DDR ‘label’ often results in delays to programme implementation;
  • Use our knowledge and learning to inform and influence the DDR discourse at the global level through engagement with bilaterals and multilateral agencies;
  • Run high level Reintegration training courses for field practitioners to enhance and develop their practical knowledge and skills.

Security Sector Reform

The OECD DAC Guidelines on Security System Reform and Governance agreed at the ministerial level in 2004 define the security system as including: core security actors (e.g. armed forces, police, gendarmerie, border guards, customs and immigration, and intelligence and security services); security management and oversight bodies (e.g. ministries of defence and internal affairs, financial management bodies and public complaints commissions); justice and law enforcement institutions (e.g. the judiciary, prisons, prosecution services, traditional justice systems); and non-statutory security forces (e.g. private security companies, guerrilla armies and private militia).
 

International Alert uses the concept of JSSR, Justice and Security Sector Reform, to emphasize the centrality of justice. It is derived from thinking from UNDP’s Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery (BCPR).

In many of the conflict zones where International Alert works, the security sector (armed forces, police and intelligence services) is a key obstacle to building lasting peace. If security agents do not play a legitimate and accountable role in providing security for citizens then not only are they unable to prevent conflicts occurring but they can also be a source of tension and violence. Security Sector Reform (SSR) aims to make the security and justice sector a positive force for reducing conflict and building a stable environment.

Reform of the security and justice sector is a vital part of post-conflict reconstruction. Without guaranteed security for civilians, efforts to disarm communities will not succeed, as people are unlikely to surrender their weapons if they feel unsafe, refugees and internally displaced people will not return to their homes and the likelihood of investment in the economy by businesses is slim. SSR related programmes have become an increasingly important component of peace processes. The success of SSR programming is essential for providing the necessary secure space for long-term equitable economic development to be initiated and consolidated.

This requires:
  • Transparency
  • Accountability
  • Effective and legitimate use of resources
  • Enhancing the role of civil society as monitors and independent overseers

Encouraging civilian involvement and participation in security sector reform

We have been working on the issue of security sector reform (SSR) since 2000. All too often, it is seen as a purely technical issue, and is based on training for security professionals and those working at the political and decision-making level. Whilst this training is important, it is also vital that security sector reform involves the local community so that they accept it, so that it reflects their needs and so that they can play a role in overseeing its work.

One of the areas we currently focusing on is building the capacity of civil society to become more involved in SSR. This work includes supporting research by local partners in order to provide accurate data on security issues (for example gauging opinions of the security situation at the grassroots level, assessing priorities and needs of ordinary people) and ensuring that this knowledge informs decision making at the national and international level. This work is taking place in the West Africa and Nepal.

Privatisation of security

The privatisation of security is a neglected part of security sector reform because traditionally, reform has been focused on the police, military and intelligence services as they are controlled by the state. However, over the past decade there has been a surge in the privatisation of security. Private security companies provide ‘police-type’ security, such as guarding banks or other buildings. Private military companies offer military services (although usually not direct combat) such as training, equipment, logistics and strategic advice. In many countries, for example, most recently in Iraq, private military and security companies are a significant part of the security sector. However, they are often not regulated so there are few controls on where and how they operate, increasing the likelihood of human rights abuses.

Working with Saferworld and the UNDP/Stability Pact South Eastern Europe Small Arms Clearinghouse (SEESAC) International Alert completed a survey of the implications of the privatisation of security in South Eastern Europe. The study concentrates on the ramifications that private security companies have on SSR processes and SALW proliferation in the region. This report covers all eight countries covered by the Stability Pact and examines separately the three entities within the Republic of Serbia and Montenegro. The report can be downloaded from the SEESAC Website.

Contact
Contact Title: 
Richard Reeve
Contact Name: 
rreeve@international-alert.org

Words that Kill

Rumours, Prejudice, Stereotypes and Myths Amongst the People of the Great lakes Region of Africa
International Alert
Sun, 01/02/2009
International Alert
60 pages
London, UK
NA

Much of the violent conflict in Burundi, Rwanda and the Kivu provinces of Congo over the past fifty years has been because of discrimination—and political, social and economic exclusion. In the worst cases the extreme intolerance of people of a different ethnic identity has taken the form of massacres and genocide.

This first report from the Regional Analysts Network, based on three separate, detailed studies of different locations in the Great Lakes region, demonstrates the power of rumours, myths, stereotypes and prejudices to fuel conflict. Based on interviews with ordinary citizens as well as political decision-makers and opinion-leaders, the report presents material which has hitherto been little documented, and draws original conclusions that will be of interest to a wide readership. This consolidated report makes concrete and practical recommendations, and will help decision-makers both inside and outside the Great Lakes by throwing light on the conflict issues affecting this complex region.

Publication Image
Syndicate content