This series of three country “Insights” identifies peacebuilding priorities in Burundi, Liberia and Nepal, and discusses the response of the international institutions operating there. The focus institutions are primarily the World Bank and the UN. The insights provide a brief snapshot and analysis of each country’s particular peacebuilding needs, as well as the dynamics that either facilitate or hinder institutional ability to address these needs. Findings inform a synthesis report entitled ‘Peacebuilding, the World Bank and the United Nations: Debates and Practice in Burundi, Liberia and Nepal’, the summary of which is available here. This work is part of Alert’s International Institutions Programme which seeks through research and engagement to strengthen the peacebuilding impacts of international institutions in fragile and conflict-affected countries.
This series of three country “Insights” identifies peacebuilding priorities in Burundi, Liberia and Nepal, and discusses the response of the international institutions operating there. The focus institutions are primarily the World Bank and the UN. The insights provide a brief snapshot and analysis of each country’s particular peacebuilding needs, as well as the dynamics that either facilitate or hinder institutional ability to address these needs. Findings inform a synthesis report entitled ‘Peacebuilding, the World Bank and the United Nations: Debates and Practice in Burundi, Liberia and Nepal’, the summary of which is available here. This work is part of Alert’s International Institutions Programme which seeks through research and engagement to strengthen the peacebuilding impacts of international institutions in fragile and conflict-affected countries.
This series of three country “Insights” identifies peacebuilding priorities in Burundi, Liberia and Nepal, and discusses the response of the international institutions operating there. The focus institutions are primarily the World Bank and the UN. The insights provide a brief snapshot and analysis of each country’s particular peacebuilding needs, as well as the dynamics that either facilitate or hinder institutional ability to address these needs. Findings inform a synthesis report entitled ‘Peacebuilding, the World Bank and the United Nations: Debates and Practice in Burundi, Liberia and Nepal’, the summary of which is available here. This work is part of Alert’s International Institutions Programme which seeks through research and engagement to strengthen the peacebuilding impacts of international institutions in fragile and conflict-affected countries.
At the end of November, 2,000 representatives of governments, international organisations and NGOs convened in Busan as the fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness. Just before the meeting we proposed five criteria by which to judge its outcome as far as conflict-affected and fragile countries are concerned
Our five criteria were:
Two thousand representatives of governments, the UN, other multilateral organisations and NGOs will shortly convene in Busan, South Korea, as the Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness to discuss the effectiveness of overseas development aid.
It’s countries affected by armed conflict that face the toughest development challenges. What would success at Busan look like for them?
New thinking on development and conflict
Jackson W Speare, Head of our Liberia Office, was interviewed by the Newshour programme for the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) channel last week. In the programme, during which current Liberian President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf and challenger Winston Tubman also give their thoughts on the prospects for peace in the country, Jackson talks about the view from the ground among Liberia's youth and those who do not live in the capital Monrovia.
The election, which is taking place today, is only the second election since the end of Liberia's civil war.
'The World Development Report 2011: Conflict, Security and Development' is shifting the language of international policy on supporting peace and development in fragile and conflict-affected countries. In a briefing for the Bretton Woods Project, Monica Stephen of International Alert examines how the World Bank’s operations need to adjust to support peace and development.
This briefing has been published by the Bretton Woods Project on 16 September 2011.
Why is development progress difficult in fragile and conflict-affected countries? International Alert conducted a series of studies in Burundi, Liberia and Nepal to explore this question in terms of how international institutions channel aid to support peace and development progress. The studies focused on two multilaterals: the World Bank and the United Nations. From the country studies, some common institutional challenges and opportunities emerged: governance and political legitimacy; responsiveness to fast-changing contexts; managing organisational mandates; harnessing comparative advantage between institutions; and translating policy commitments into practice. This summary of research findings and analysis includes a series of emerging recommendations. Rather than providing answers, this paper uses evidence to stimulate new conversation, thinking and practice.
International Alert gave evidence to the House of Commons Select Committee on International Development yesterday, as part of their formal Inquiry into “Working Effectively in Conflict Affected and Fragile States”.

Photo: © International Alert/Kashish Das Shrestha

Photo: © International Alert/Kashish Das Shrestha
Dan Smith, Alert Secretary-General, was interviewed in Washington DC at the Woodrow Wilson Centre last week about the nature of our work. You can watch his thoughts, which include some observations about the challenges and opportunities of peacebuilding, below:
Alert has lobbied the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's Development Assistance Committee (OECD-DAC) to emphasise the need for a different model of aid effectiveness when operating in ‘Fragile States’. The DAC Fragile States Group has started a number of initiatives in recent months that certainly go in the right direction. These include work on service delivery, allocation and ‘whole of government approaches’. Over a longer period, the Network on Conflict, Peace and Development Co-operation has produced guidance on conflict prevention and security sector reform. At the highest level, the member agencies of the DAC have now agreed Principles of Good International Engagement in Fragile States which articulate some of Alert’s concerns. However, there is still a long way to travel before the global aid system fully integrates these principles in its myriad activities and adapts the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness accordingly.
“To prevent conflict, international partners must first understand the causes of conflict and ensure their aid does not unintentionally fuel it.” 2006 White Paper, “Making governance work for the poor.”
Alert engages regularly with a wide range of departments across the UK government, particularly in the Department of International Development (DFID) and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO). We work with UK officials both as an individual organisation and also collectively with other conflict prevention NGO partners through the Peace and Security Liaison Group. PSLG members, for example, have been engaged in a process of mapping of the UK Government’s Conflict and Security Policy to look at how the UK Government has responded over the past five years to changing security needs, particularly in its international policy, and to understand how far conflict prevention/ peacebuilding has been integrated into broader government thinking. The PSLG has also sought to influence the Government Public Service Agreement on conflict prevention and resolution from late 2007.
In its individual advocacy, Alert focuses on the UK Government’s policies, funding streams and institutional set-up that determine how effectively it can contribute to peacebuilding, including through the UK’s operationalisation of UN SCR 1325 (see the section on the UN).
DFID has recently launched its fourth White Paper, potentially the most ambitious reform of the way British aid is designed and delivered since 1997.
Ahead of its publication, our Secretary General, Dan Smith, has met with the Secretary of State for International Development to give advice on the options for changing the way the British Government approaches overseas development aid for conflict affected and fragile states. Similar discussions were undertaken with DFID senior officials.
Alert has been calling for a fundamental reform of the way the UK delivers overseas aid to conflict affected countries and this White Paper, while not going as far as we would have liked, does offer a huge opportunity to harness the potential of UK aid to build peace. See our submission to DFID here.
Ahead of the General Election taking place in 2010, we recently hosted a series of debates on what sort of support is needed by conflict affected states with parliamentarians at each of the political party conferences. Find out more
Going forward, our work will remain focused on the extent to which this kind of knowledge is integrated into spending plans and programming, and the degree to which the commitments are put into practice.
Read about our aid effectiveness work in the UK: