Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have a critical role in a country’s economy, be it through job creation, entrepreneurship or income generation. In addition, given their proximity to the local context, it is also assumed that SMEs are well placed to address conflict issues and take an active part in peacebuilding at the local level.
Though not expected to tackle issues at every level, SMEs are likely able to effectively address manifestations and repercussions of wider problems within their own communities. They also have the potential of bringing together conflicting parties by creating shared economic interest. While this may have its own risks, it also means SMEs can be more effective than larger business entities in implementing socially responsible policies or quickly taking advantage of gaps in the market for products that link peace-supportive social and/or environmental benefits.
The success of the Business for Peace Alliance (BPA) in Sri Lanka demonstrated how SMEs could be brought together effectively to promote responsible practices and work across ethno-political conflict divides. The BPA, comprising of SME entrepreneurs from across Sri Lanka, worked together to address local issues, brainstorm solutions and share best practices. They also developed practical models for reconciliation and conflict prevention at the local level as well as joint business ventures to strengthen multi-ethnic business partnerships.
While examples like the BPA exist, as discussed at the recent Annual Conference of the Knowledge Platform Security and Rule of Law, there is a greater need to understand the role of SMEs in contributing to stability in fragile and conflict-affected contexts. This has become even more urgent because support to SMEs in fragile and conflict-affected states has become a priority for the international development community.
To promote the growth of SMEs and entrepreneurship, donors are increasingly working with local governments to design and roll out incentives packages and strategies. Most of these approaches are designed in such a way as to keep economic incentives in mind, either through addressing business constraints or through the creation of an enabling business environment. However, these interventions and strategies fail to take into account the wide range of complex political and social dimensions that the SMEs are an intrinsic part of, and the impact they can have on settings marked by conflict and fragility.
Furthermore, there is a need to appreciate that in these scenarios, formal reforms alone may not be sufficient to promote SME growth or for them to reap the benefits of an improved business environment. In short, as Paul Lange of the Clingendael Institute concludes in his article, 'Beyond treating symptoms', there is a need for theories of change for inclusive SME development that do justice to the complexities in settings marked by conflict and fragility.
NWO-WOTRO’s supported project on 'Conflict-sensitive employment under construction: Peace and stability strategies for the private sector in Afghanistan', focuses on understanding the drivers and challenges of conflict-sensitive employment and investment in the labour-intensive construction, infrastructure and transport sector in Afghanistan.
Based on findings from the empirical research, the project will develop and pilot schemes on conflict-sensitive employment, with the aim of understanding how to embed conflict-sensitive employment in an investment strategy. This proposed conflict-sensitive employment scheme will be developed based on the premises that such a framework requires an understanding of the context in which a company operates and how this company interacts with the context.
The long-term goal of this conflict-sensitive employment framework is to help increase social capital, strengthen political voices, foster positive mobility and manage ‘grey’ (or 'shadow') economies that often compete directly with formal private sector or donor-funded initiatives for employment of vulnerable groups.
The research consortium includes three institutions with a strong track record in conflict-affected settings: the Bonn International Center for Conversion brings in its research capacities, The Liaison Office is a leading NGO of grassroots research in Afghanistan and International Alert brings in its wide network of international stakeholders.
This blog was originally published on the Knowledge Platform Security and Rule of Law website.