Caucasus and Central Asia

Overview

Background of the conflict and Alert’s engagement

The five Central Asian states that became independent with the break-up of the Soviet Union – Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan – escaped the widespread conflict that took place in the Caucasus (with the exception of the civil war in Tajikistan), but share many of the risk factors behind modern conflict: ethnic and religious tensions, scarce natural resources (particularly water and arable land), uneven development, overlapping ethnic and state borders, fragile governments and proximity to a very instable and conflict-prone country, Afghanistan.

Like other parts of the former USSR, Central Asia has been undergoing a considerable political, social and economic transition. Despite some initial reforms and relatively successful economic growth, especially in the natural resource-rich Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, significant structural challenges remain in the region, with widespread poverty and out-migration affecting Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan.

A relative stability in the region has been achieved by harsh political control rather than through inclusive economic development, participatory governance and effective institutions. The root causes of conflict have thus remained unaddressed.

Tajikistan’s civil war in the early 1990s has left the country with simmering tensions between secularists and Islamists, which have recently resurfaced.

Kyrgyzstan saw two revolutions in the last five years that overthrew undemocratic and corrupt regimes. In May and June 2010, inter-ethnic violence in the South of the country left hundreds dead and shattered the relatively good relations of the majority Kyrgyz and minority Uzbek populations.

Relationships of both Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan with neighbouring Uzbekistan have also been strained for years over the use of water resources.

How

The main approach Alert applies in Central Asia is dialogue. We facilitate dialogue on sensitive issues such as the role of religion in a secular state, the prevention of radicalism as well as inter-ethnic confidence-building and reconciliation. These dialogues have different formats and aim to involve key actors from government institutions, civil society, religious institutions and all affected communities. While in Kyrgyzstan, the focus is on rebuilding inter-community trust and preventing a relapse of violence, in Tajikistan the main area of our work is to bridge the divide between religious communities and the secular government.

Why

In Kyrgyzstan, only days after the June 2010 pogroms in Osh and Jalal-Abad, Alert was invited by President Roza Otumbaeva to support confidence-building and reconciliation. Our assessment conducted in July 2010 concluded that the violence in the South resulted from three main national divisions – state-citizens, North-South and Kyrgyz-Uzbek. In this context, Alert decided to focus on recovery from the violence and supporting the emergence of a new political culture that fosters transparent governance addressing North-South and inter-community relations. Dialogue was chosen as an approach that both brings divided groups together and provides space for formulating a nationally-owned vision for peace and reconciliation.

Over the past years in Tajikistan, the government has been gradually side-lining the Islamic opposition and religious communities from the political process. Engaging both sides in a dialogue process and the development of a shared vision on the role of religion in a secular state was seen as the needed approach in this context.

Projects

Dialogue for a policy on the relationship between the secular state and religion
TAJIKISTAN

The rise in religious radicalism, combined with other social and economic issues, is contributing to tension in communities, and may even be utilised to foment widespread unrest in Tajikistan given the right triggers.

However, a major exacerbating factor is the government’s response and policy towards religion and religious organisations, which risks alienating these communities. Religious values and communities can play an important role in promoting democracy, tolerance and peace, and as such, religious leaders are important actors in civil society with a great deal of influence over their constituencies.

This project aims to harness the potential of religious leaders for their peacebuilding role, to foster positive relationships with State bodies that define policy towards religion and to improve that policy in a way that reduces tensions within and between religious and secular communities. It does so by combining the peacebuilding expertise of International Alert with those non-governmental actors that participated in the Tajik peace process, building on existing capacities and the positive Tajik peace-making experience.

This project is funded by the European Union.

Tajikistan
Public Committee on the Development of Tajikistan
Marc Fumagalli
Country Manager
Policy dialogue initiative on youth and radicalism
TAJIKISTAN

The project is a follow-up to the pilot Zivik-funded project ‘Tajikistan Policy Dialogue Initiative’, which Alert implemented in 2009. It continues the policy dialogue set up within the framework of the first project and focuses on youth policies and the prevention of radicalism. One of the key outputs is a policy concept on the prevention of radicalism among youth, which will inform the overall strategy on secular state-religion relations developed with European Commission's funding.

The project promotes participatory planning approaches, fosters social inclusion of youth and mitigates the tension between the secular authorities and the religious communities. The project facilitates dialogue on the critical issue of youth, religion and radicalism at a policy level, enhances dialogue and interaction between secular and religious youth, raises the awareness of youth on religion, democracy and tolerance, and enhances their participation in policy-making processes.

The project is organised around two strands of activity: policy development and youth participation. Within the first strand, a policy working group is tasked to develop a concept paper on the prevention of radicalism among youth and advocates for its endorsement by the State Committee on Youth Affairs, Sport and Tourism. Within the second strand, secular and religious students take part in a student camp on youth participation and the prevention of radicalism, and in student debates discussing policy solutions and needs for state support to youth policies.

Tajikistan
Youth and Society, Khujand
Marc Fumagalli
Country Manager
National forum for dialogue
KYRGYZSTAN

The project supports the formulation of a nationally-owned approach to peacebuilding through the establishment of a Nationali Dialogue for Kyrgyzstan. The Forum involves 30-35 influential, well respected and committed individuals, over a third of whom are women, from state institutions, civil society, religious authorities, academia and the private sector, including representatives of all major ethnic groups.

The main objective of the project is to conduct an informal high-level dialogue drawing on all sectors of society to exchange views about socio-political and other developments in Kyrgyzstan, with a view to enhancing understanding and contributing to a creative and peaceful resolution of the pressing issues facing Kyrgyzstan. It will be achieved through the inclusion of all major parties to the conflict in a dialogue process on peace and reconciliation, the facilitation and support to the formation of a broad consensus on the need to prevent escalation and to build lasting peace. A series of practical activities can also result from the process and are likely to include research, analysis and presentation of the conflict in its complexity that will allow for opportunities for conflict transformation and conflict prevention to be identified and explored.

More specifically, the project will produce the following outputs:

  • a National Dialogue for Kyrgyzstan will be established and its members’ capacities built;
  • tools or possible practical activities to support the dialogue process will be developed – these can include in-depth analysis of the peacebuilding and reconciliation needs and processes; conflict mitigation and prevention measures at the community level and promotion of the Forum’s work and key messages to the public.
Federal Department of Foreign Affairs of Switzerland, Political Divsion IV – Human Security
Kyrgyzstan
Ljubomir Jandrijasevic
Country Manager
Enhancing local conflict management capacity in South Kyrgyzstan
KYRGYZSTAN

The project is designed to address the immediate consequences of the June 2010 violence in Osh and Jalal-Abad and to create conditions for rebuilding inter-community relations in the South of the country. The first component of the project targets students in ethnically mixed universities – Osh and Jalal-Abad State Universities and the Osh State Law Institute. Through the provision of space for dialogue and support to joint initiatives, the project will reduce the tension between ethnic Kyrgyz and ethnic Uzbek students and will increase their knowledge and skills to manage conflict. About 120 students will improve their understanding of the needs of each community, build interpersonal relations and gain skills and understanding that will help prevent violence on campus.

As part of the project’s second component, Alert will assess the prospects for private sector involvement in peacebuilding and will identify possible areas for further engagement. Alert will also facilitate a lesson-sharing visit of representatives of the Caucasus Business Development Network (CBDN) to Osh and Jalal-Abad.  

The third component of the project links up grassroots work in the South with the National Dialogue Forum. Alert and civil society organisations engaged in confidence-building work will channel lessons learnt from community-level interventions to the high-level policy process.

South Kyrgyzstan

Publications

Publication Image

This is a set of tools for companies concerned about improving their impact on host countries to begin thinking more creatively about understanding and minimising conflict risk, and actively contributing to peace.

Fri, 09/01/2006
Publication Image

Although Central Asia has remained relatively peaceful in the years since the break-up of the Soviet Union, there is still a considerable potential for conflict in the region. The Strategic Framework for Peacebuilding provides an in-depth analysis of conflict potential in Central Asia, from which it derives a peacebuilding strategy. The report focuses its attention on three states: Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. The regional context (Afghanistan) and the influence and interest of major powers (USA, Russia, China) in the region are also taken into account, as are common regional factors like strict border regimes cutting through communities, the complex ethnic situation in the Ferghana valley, the drug trade and the threat of Islamism. The headline conclusion is that the central threat to stability lies not, as has long been thought, in ethnic rivalries or competition over resources, but rather in the relationship between the citizens and the state. Несмотря на то, что в Центральной Азии сохраняется относительно мирная обстановка с момента распада СССР, значительная угроза конфликта все еще существует. Стратегия по построению мира основывается на глубоком анализе конфликтного потенциала в Центральной Азии. В отчете уделяется отдельное внимание трем государствам: Кыргызстану, Таджикистану и Узбекистану. Были учтены такие факторы, как региональный контекст (Афганистан), интересы основных игроков (США, Россия, Китай), а также региональные факторы, среди которых ужесточение пограничных режимов, сложная этническая ситуация в долине Ферганы, торговля наркотиками и угроза исламизма. Основный вывод заключается в том, что главная угроза стабильности исходит не из этнических конфликтов или конкуренции за ресурсы, как это в течение долгого времени предполагалось ранее, а из отношения между гражданами и государством.

Fri, 09/01/2006
Publication Image

Although Central Asia has remained relatively peaceful in the years since the break-up of the Soviet Union, there is still a considerable potential for conflict in the region. The Strategic Framework for Peacebuilding provides an in-depth analysis of conflict potential in Central Asia, from which it derives a peacebuilding strategy. The report focuses its attention on three states: Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. The regional context (Afghanistan) and the influence and interest of major powers (USA, Russia, China) in the region are also taken into account, as are common regional factors like strict border regimes cutting through communities, the complex ethnic situation in the Ferghana valley, the drug trade and the threat of islamism. The headline conclusion is that the central threat to stability lies not, as has long been thought, in ethnic rivalries or competition over resources, but rather in the relationship between the citizens and the state.

Wed, 02/01/2006
Publication Image

This is a set of tools for companies concerned about improving their impact on host countries to begin thinking more creatively about understanding and minimising conflict risk, and actively contributing to peace.

Tue, 03/01/2005
Publication Image

This study examines the activities and identifies the organisations that have been involved in the work against the illicit trafficking of small arms, following the July 2001 UN Conference on the Illicit Trade of Small Arms and Light Weapons in all its Aspects.

Thu, 04/01/2004
Syndicate content

News

Can we prevent the repetition of last year’s June events?
A draft policy concept on the prevention of radicalism among youth
Learning about conflict and peace at Alert’s student camps
Enhancing local conflict management capacities
From national level dialogue to grassroots work